In Hecksher-Ohlin's world, by trade, each countries' factor price (W/r) will be eventually the same. (Remember that in the H-O world, commodities can freely move while factors cannot. However, as a result of free trade of commodities, factor prices will be the same as well as commodity prices).
The relation between factor price (W/r) and factor intensity (K/L) | |
|
Assumptions we sustain:
|
| If H country's total endowment ratio is kH, the wage-rental ratio in H will range (W/r)U < (W/r) < (W/r)L | |
The relation between factor price (W/r) and commodity price (PX / PY) | |
|
As (W/r) increases, PX / PY increases, because X is
more labour intensive.
Before trade, (PX / PY)F is greater than (PX / PY)H as H is labour abundant. Therefore, from the corresponding factor prices, (W/r)F > (W/r)H before trade. |
The Theorem |
|
Now combine the two graphs:
|
|
By trade, the two countries' commodity prices will converge
to the one world price (PX / PY)W.
Eventually, (PX / PY)F = (PX / PY)W = (PX / PY)H after trade. When (PX / PY) = (PX / PY)W, the only corresponding factor price is (W/r)W. With (W/r)W, both H and F use kX and kY for the two sectors' production. |
More discussion - Factor Intensity ReversedWe sustain the assumption that X is (always) more labour intensive. However, sometimes it is possible that two industries change the order of factor intensities. Suppose kY > kX when (W/r) is low, but kY < kX when (W/r) is high. Then the graph we saw before changes: |
|
The relation between (W/r) and (PX / PY) is not linear
any more. When (W/r) is low,
as (W/r) increases, PX / PY
increases because X is more labour intensive. Once (W/r) is higher
than (W/r)*, Y is more labour
intensive. Therefore, as (W/r) increases, PY increases faster than
PX, i.e. (PX / PY)
decreases.
In this case, even if there is one commodity price (PX / PYW in the world by trade, two factor prices (W/r)' and (W/r)" can exist. We cannot guarantee that H and F have the same (W/r). |